<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lending Club SEC Update During the Quiet Period</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/</link>
	<description>Experience with Lending Club &#38; Prosper.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been involved in taxations for lengthier then I care to acknowledge, both on the personal side (all my employed life-time!!) and from a legal standpoint since satisfying the bar and following up on tax law. I&#039;ve put up a lot of advice and righted a lot of wrongs, and I must say that what you&#039;ve posted makes perfect sense. Please uphold the good work - the more individuals know the better they&#039;ll be outfitted to deal with the tax man, and that&#039;s what it&#039;s all about.&lt;!--more--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been involved in taxations for lengthier then I care to acknowledge, both on the personal side (all my employed life-time!!) and from a legal standpoint since satisfying the bar and following up on tax law. I&#8217;ve put up a lot of advice and righted a lot of wrongs, and I must say that what you&#8217;ve posted makes perfect sense. Please uphold the good work &#8211; the more individuals know the better they&#8217;ll be outfitted to deal with the tax man, and that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about.<!--more--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-666</guid>
		<description>I have spoken to Rob Garcia at LC several times and know that some new enhancements to the site are in the works.  I am truly hoping that LC will offer better ways of contacting borrowers to discuss listings with them (perhaps similar to the way that Prosper has profile pages for all members).  Photos help also.  Watch list capability is also important, as it is tedious to do searches everytime one is looking for a listing to bid on.  I will ask Rob, next contact, about the borrower verification process.  I know that Prosper does not verify all info about borrowers, but I believe that loans above a certain (unknown) limit do have income, bank account info and identity (via drivers license) verification processes.  

I started at LC using their portfolio plans to search out my bids for me.  Certainly, at both LC and Prosper, I learned quickly how important is to look at each listing, not only by the numbers, but to try and get a feel for borrower&#039;s honesty and credit-worthiness.  My late loans at both sites are results of portfolio bidding.  So I truly hope that LC will enhance capabilities when they reopen to allow &quot;educated&quot; and experienced bidders to investigate deeper into the listings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spoken to Rob Garcia at LC several times and know that some new enhancements to the site are in the works.  I am truly hoping that LC will offer better ways of contacting borrowers to discuss listings with them (perhaps similar to the way that Prosper has profile pages for all members).  Photos help also.  Watch list capability is also important, as it is tedious to do searches everytime one is looking for a listing to bid on.  I will ask Rob, next contact, about the borrower verification process.  I know that Prosper does not verify all info about borrowers, but I believe that loans above a certain (unknown) limit do have income, bank account info and identity (via drivers license) verification processes.  </p>
<p>I started at LC using their portfolio plans to search out my bids for me.  Certainly, at both LC and Prosper, I learned quickly how important is to look at each listing, not only by the numbers, but to try and get a feel for borrower&#8217;s honesty and credit-worthiness.  My late loans at both sites are results of portfolio bidding.  So I truly hope that LC will enhance capabilities when they reopen to allow &#8220;educated&#8221; and experienced bidders to investigate deeper into the listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Loan Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Personal Loan Portfolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and commenting on Lending Club&#039;s SEC filing. 

Evelyn, I agree that it sounds scary, but it also sounds similar to what Prosper does on their loans. Most of the stuff you see on the screen there is not verified. The confirmation is spotty of information provided and there is absolutely no way to know if the person will use the loan as described.  Well, I guess &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fynanz.com/help/faq/borrowing#q2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fynanz is trying&lt;/a&gt; to enforce what the loans are used for, but money is always fungible. 

As Debt Kid said, Lending Club likely must show worst case scenario in the SEC filing. The pudding proof is in what they put on their website and what they actually do.  I don&#039;t expect them to validate 100% of the details on every loan, but check a few details on each one to know if everything looks kosher.  IMO, the most important thing is to verify the person&#039;s identity in some way. That way lenders know at least that the credit score and details are correct.  The rest of the stuff is almost always easy to fake.

I am still holding out (like most readers here) that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/92/poll-results-lending-club-will-survive/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lending Club will survive&lt;a/&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and commenting on Lending Club&#8217;s SEC filing. </p>
<p>Evelyn, I agree that it sounds scary, but it also sounds similar to what Prosper does on their loans. Most of the stuff you see on the screen there is not verified. The confirmation is spotty of information provided and there is absolutely no way to know if the person will use the loan as described.  Well, I guess <a href="http://www.fynanz.com/help/faq/borrowing#q2">Fynanz is trying</a> to enforce what the loans are used for, but money is always fungible. </p>
<p>As Debt Kid said, Lending Club likely must show worst case scenario in the SEC filing. The pudding proof is in what they put on their website and what they actually do.  I don&#8217;t expect them to validate 100% of the details on every loan, but check a few details on each one to know if everything looks kosher.  IMO, the most important thing is to verify the person&#8217;s identity in some way. That way lenders know at least that the credit score and details are correct.  The rest of the stuff is almost always easy to fake.</p>
<p>I am still holding out (like most readers here) that <a href="http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/92/poll-results-lending-club-will-survive/">Lending Club will survive<a />!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebtKid</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>DebtKid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-652</guid>
		<description>I read most of the filing today. The &quot;risks&quot; section is scary in ANY S-1 filing. Go back and look at Google&#039;s. It&#039;s intentionally as worst case scenario as possible to cover legal butts. 

As for minimum work...well, technological platforms that manage thousands of micro-payments from thousands of different members don&#039;t just invent themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read most of the filing today. The &#8220;risks&#8221; section is scary in ANY S-1 filing. Go back and look at Google&#8217;s. It&#8217;s intentionally as worst case scenario as possible to cover legal butts. </p>
<p>As for minimum work&#8230;well, technological platforms that manage thousands of micro-payments from thousands of different members don&#8217;t just invent themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Posted the above without adding my thoughts that LC appears like it will be doing minimum work for its 1% service fee.  I will really have  think hard about committing any more funds there in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted the above without adding my thoughts that LC appears like it will be doing minimum work for its 1% service fee.  I will really have  think hard about committing any more funds there in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/116/lending-club-sec-update-quiet-period/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalloanportfolio.com/?p=116#comment-642</guid>
		<description>I did a quick skim of the SEC prospectus.  Scary stuff:

 Information supplied by borrower members may be inaccurate.
 
Borrower members supply a variety of unverified information that is included in the borrower member loan listings on our website. We do not verify this information, and it may be inaccurate. For example, we do not verify a borrower memberâ€™s stated social affiliations (such as educational affiliations), home ownership status, job title, employer or tenure, and the information borrower members supply may be inaccurate. Borrower members may misrepresent their intentions for the use of loan proceeds. Unless we have indicated otherwise in a loan listing, we do not verify a borrower memberâ€™s stated income. For example, unlike most traditional banks, we do not verify borrower member paystubs, IRS Forms W-2, federal or state income tax returns, bank and savings account balances, retirement account balances, letters from employers, home ownership or rental records, car ownership records or any records related to past bankruptcy and legal proceedings. The identity of borrower members is not revealed to lender members, and lender members also have no ability to obtain or verify borrower member information. Potential lender members may only communicate with borrower members through Lending Club website postings, and then only on an anonymous and unverified basis. If you rely on misleading or unverified information supplied by borrower members in deciding to purchase Notes, you may lose part or all of the purchase price you pay for a Note. Consequently, lender members should not rely on unverified information provided by borrower members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a quick skim of the SEC prospectus.  Scary stuff:</p>
<p> Information supplied by borrower members may be inaccurate.</p>
<p>Borrower members supply a variety of unverified information that is included in the borrower member loan listings on our website. We do not verify this information, and it may be inaccurate. For example, we do not verify a borrower memberâ€™s stated social affiliations (such as educational affiliations), home ownership status, job title, employer or tenure, and the information borrower members supply may be inaccurate. Borrower members may misrepresent their intentions for the use of loan proceeds. Unless we have indicated otherwise in a loan listing, we do not verify a borrower memberâ€™s stated income. For example, unlike most traditional banks, we do not verify borrower member paystubs, IRS Forms W-2, federal or state income tax returns, bank and savings account balances, retirement account balances, letters from employers, home ownership or rental records, car ownership records or any records related to past bankruptcy and legal proceedings. The identity of borrower members is not revealed to lender members, and lender members also have no ability to obtain or verify borrower member information. Potential lender members may only communicate with borrower members through Lending Club website postings, and then only on an anonymous and unverified basis. If you rely on misleading or unverified information supplied by borrower members in deciding to purchase Notes, you may lose part or all of the purchase price you pay for a Note. Consequently, lender members should not rely on unverified information provided by borrower members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.560 seconds -->

